Muscle Learning Activities
| Goal: | To get briefed on the challenge of building better jumping frogs. |
| Implementation: | HTML with links to 2D images and videos |
| Activity: | Students will read introductory text and watch videos on the need to build better jumping frogs. |
| Duration: | < 1 day |
| Author: | Teacher |
| Status: | Design completed, in implementation |
Introduce the problem: student has to design a frog to win a contest. Possible ideas include,
| Goal: | Learn about the structure and function of muscles |
| Implementation: | HTML with links to 2D images and VRML models |
| Activity: | Students will read descriptions of muslces and answer workbook questions |
| Duration: | 1-2 days |
| Author: | Chris Thu |
| Status: | In design |
Students will familize themselves with the structure and function of various muscles in the body and how they relate to one another. Students will primarily use the Information Frames as a vehicle for learning the topics in a structured manner. The information frames can link to various images, movies, and 3D models. A workbook assignment will be completed so that students know what topics to cover and evaluate themselves as they go along.
| Goal: | Learn how different muscle types have different strengths, speeds, and endurance. |
| Implementation: | Java Applet |
| Activity: | Students will perform a lab experiment whereby they alter the composition of muscle fiber types in a muscle and see how that affects the muscles' performance. |
| Duration: | 1 - 2 days |
| Authors: | Ramani, David, Chris |
| Status: | Design 50% complete, in implementation |
To demonstrate how different muscles types have different strengths, reaction times, and endurances, students will conduct two activities: (1) the muscle composition lab, and (2) race track game.
This would be accompanied by a workseet that guided them through the activity and then asked them what combinations would be ideal for (1) the jumping frog contest, (2) the frog's natural habitat, (3) for different types of atheletes, and for different areas of the body (e.g., back muscles versus the biceps).

Some students may be interested in seeing the mathematical equations that comprise the muscle model to gain better understanding of their behavior and to be able to make predictions of their experimental outcomes.
| Goal: | Learn advanced topics of muscle structure and function |
| Implementation: | HTML and Java Applet |
| Activity: | Students will go deeper into muscles and learn about sarcomeres, then go to the lab area and find out about the relationship between starting length of the muscle and generation of force |
| Duration: | 1 day |
| Authors: | Chris |
| Status: | In design |
Using information frames and a worksheet, students will learn more detailed information about the microstructure and function of muslces. Students will do the lab to determine ideal starting length and graph generation of force over stretch of muscle
| Goal: | Learn how the length of bones and position of muscles affect movement. |
| Implementation: | Java Applet |
| Activity: | Students will do a lever lab to determine relationships between length of bones and where the muscles attach with respect to the amount of force generated. |
| Duration: | 1 - 2 days |
| Authors: | Ramani, David |
| Status: | In design |
The lab would demonstrated how mechanical advantage (i.e., the lever multiplication factor) is determined by the lenght of the effort arm divided by the resistance arm. This lab could be done by the teacher in class, or by students on the computer. The latter case would make it easier to simulate a series of interconnected levers (such as legs) and see how they affect distance of jump.
| Goal: | To learn simple frog behavior (eating, jumping, survival) as well as simple projectile motion. |
| Implementation: | Java Applet |
| Activity: | Students will play a survival game whereby they use knowledge about projectile motion to help a frog eat and survive. The student wins points for eating flies (thereby increasing their energy store) while at the same time must avoid being eaten by predators (in this case, birds). |
| URL: | http://k-2.stanford.edu/javafrog/ |
| Duration: | 1 day |
| Authors: | David, Ramani, Teacher |
| Status: | Implementation complete, worksheet needed |
| Goal: | To enable students to test their jumping frog designs to see how well they perform. |
| Implementation: | Java Applet? |
| Activity: | Students will evaluate their frog designs on the computer and have it simulate the jumping dynamics, taking into account relevant factors such as weight, muscle composition, insertion points, etc. |
| Duration: | 1 - 2 days |
| Authors: | Ramani, Chris, David, Teacher |
| Status: | Waiting design |